Believe nothing that you hear and half of what you see, plan nothing except to react to the given situation at hand, and trust only your own strong right arm...
A faint podcast episode of the early beginnings on the mandated insurance industry in the late 1800's and early 1900's comes to mind for some reason back when American leaders still had balls and called bullshit on the entire scheme. Of course as you'd expect one of the biggest fraudsters of the insurance scams came from schlomo's community and friends, but since then many others have since jumped on the bandwagon because why not? Money is fake anyways as is most of the economy so why not get yours so long as you don't get caught or break the code of thieves. One of the favorite past times for schlomo in this era was to deliberately burn down their textile industry to collect the money, a well known scam of theirs for the last 150 years. The problem wasn't just collecting their money from a failed business venture to rinse and repeat, but that they'd burn down the businesses next to them or the whole goddamn block.
Given the corporate and governmental take over of farms in the past century the real question is who owns all of these industrial farms? Are they knocking out the competition to secure the food supply completely or are they sabotaging themselves because they can flex that control without the necessity of controlling it all? The big question I'm considering having no doubt either which way on the previous questions: whose collecting on the insurance if any? We know how these people work from both sides. Even when you lose you're winning. Seems like it would explain all these crazy explanations as it serves two purposes or more. One to cause panic while justifying doubling or tripling the prices of the commodity. Two it fulfills their masters end goals of further herding the sheep into the slaughter. Then again to cover their ass and collect big payouts for doing what you had to do anyways.
I tell ya. With friends like these who needs enemies. At least Genghis Khan had the balls to just kill entire cities outright as horrifically as it may seem. I'm sure even these actions would be too unsettling for him. Nobody knows sadism more than a coward.
A faint podcast episode of the early beginnings on the mandated insurance industry in the late 1800's and early 1900's comes to mind for some reason back when American leaders still had balls and called bullshit on the entire scheme. Of course as you'd expect one of the biggest fraudsters of the insurance scams came from schlomo's community and friends, but since then many others have since jumped on the bandwagon because why not? Money is fake anyways as is most of the economy so why not get yours so long as you don't get caught or break the code of thieves. One of the favorite past times for schlomo in this era was to deliberately burn down their textile industry to collect the money, a well known scam of theirs for the last 150 years. The problem wasn't just collecting their money from a failed business venture to rinse and repeat, but that they'd burn down the businesses next to them or the whole goddamn block.
Given the corporate and governmental take over of farms in the past century the real question is who owns all of these industrial farms? Are they knocking out the competition to secure the food supply completely or are they sabotaging themselves because they can flex that control without the necessity of controlling it all? The big question I'm considering having no doubt either which way on the previous questions: whose collecting on the insurance if any? We know how these people work from both sides. Even when you lose you're winning. Seems like it would explain all these crazy explanations as it serves two purposes or more. One to cause panic while justifying doubling or tripling the prices of the commodity. Two it fulfills their masters end goals of further herding the sheep into the slaughter. Then again to cover their ass and collect big payouts for doing what you had to do anyways.
I tell ya. With friends like these who needs enemies. At least Genghis Khan had the balls to just kill entire cities outright as horrifically as it may seem. I'm sure even these actions would be too unsettling for him. Nobody knows sadism more than a coward.
What is the source of the data for that chart?