Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Hereticdrummer's avatar

I recall reading many years ago an analysis by a group of nuclear physicists. They concluded that in the event of a superpower, thermo-nuclear war, if only one in ten of the launched missiles strike and detonate, within approx. 18 months, 90% of all sentient life on earth, humans, animals & plants, will perish. One in ten of course is a low-ball figure. The reality will be more like 8 in 10. They also concluded that the safest place to be for the best chance of survival, based on ocean and atmospheric wind currents, is Patagonia off the southern tip of Chile in South America. It's a certainty that these scientists did not factor in geoengineering, the fact that it was going on back then notwithstanding, though not nearly to the extent it is perpetrated today. Regardless, if it happens, we can all pretty much bend over and kiss our asses goodbye.

Expand full comment
Greg's avatar

"He theorizes the punked Americans will use a tactical weapon in order to save face and Russia will respond with an all-out attack on American cities."

This very much correlates with Francis Parker Yockey who should now be vindicated by all Patriot American Nationalist doubters as being a man of true vision ahead of his time when he saw the Prague Trials as the beginnings of Stalin and the USSR throwing off their Jewish bolshevik masters and returning to a more natural Slavic form. Unlike your Fatima or Edgar Cayce events that were largely baseless in reality but possibly a representation of a hyper-reality, Francis Parker Yockey was grounded in the material, the real, using cold hard intellect to describe what those previous persons and events couldn't. Anyone can flow in the timeless reality streams carried on the rivers of the reality field and allow themselves to be swept up by the winds to see and know incredible things, but it takes something greater to hold oneself grounded to make sense of it all from a physical standpoint. It's why great writers and poets exist.

All of this was predicted by Yockey down to America's fall into Totalitarianism. He hoped for a more National Socialist Fuhrerprinzip model, but understood it could easily be an Ultra Liberal Capitalist one as well. His only fault is being a dreamer seeing the best in Americans only to be utterly disappointed. Thankfully, like my grandparents, they got to pass before seeing the horrors their generation created and going blissfully into the night with the illusion of what America was to them and never was for the rest of us. Yockey's model showed by the turn of the 20th century America would be a totalitarian state period. Insert 9/11 and the Patriot Act in 2001 and now you'll see it since the preconceived notions of Totalitarianism is what blinds most people to whats happening on a daily basis. The creep is always so slow and we now see how the Bolsheviks did it to Russia just as Europe now sees the racial problem we've always had and can stuff their faces in their bullshit pie for how we tried to deal with it for centuries. Like wise we see how National Socialism/Fascism rose. I'm not a big fan of karma as its largely interpreted, but we're all getting to choke on our own horseshit for once as any divine authority steps aside forcing us to deal with our own manifested problems. You can say its punishment or a lesson it's up to the individual and their maturity to draw the conclusion.

Yockey goes onto mention how he utterly disagreed with Russia's Cold War strategy of focusing its nuclear arsenal toward America's croplands, which if you want to annihilate a population long-term makes sense. He stated Russia's power was in its massive land army whereas America's weakness was its over-reliance on technology and aircraft. Russia wins maintaining a large army post-WW2 in the traditional European sense and America fails. America never had the will to occupy nobody especially at such great distances surrounded by no hostiles. In fact America always struggled to find a reason for a standing army in the first place historically. The nuclear option was all wrong though. He thought Russia ought to focus all of its nuclear might against the cities of America not the farmlands and if America had any damn brains it should focus on the opposite given the size of Russia. Food has always been a strategical tool for Russians from Napoleon to WW2. Russia is also more spread out and doesn't have nearly as many major cities like America that taking out the crops would be more devastating than it would be for American's overly reliant on globalism to get anything they need.

I have to say it's a smart decision if Russia were to finally take his advice and focus all attention toward American cities. They're gutters anyways and modern art horror shows full of the worst scum that America is too cowardly to just eliminate anyways. They'd be doing us a favor at this point as painful as it is to see it's far worse seeing what they've become.

Expand full comment
22 more comments...

No posts