A New Year is upon us, and with it come new 'cycles', a seemingly unending revolution that drives everything (hu)man knows, everything we do, everything we are, revolving in a great 'spiral' since time immemorial.
I admit I struggle with Astrology and the Solar System, Planets etc but I do believe that the things that run this place, place their bets on it. I sumise that the Sun is local.. no way no how its 93 million miles away. IF it was at that distance it would be a constant size or dot in the sky. We have all seen a HUGE sunset in our lives when the Sun is rather quite large...Are our eyes even designed to see something 93 million miles away? Stars are basically in the same place every year so again cant wrap my head around we are hurtling through space, spinning at the same time observation tells me otherwise. Again FOR SURE I feel there is something to it.. just at this time in my life it evades me.
"Essentially, it is the spiralling, spinning journey of our Earth around the Sun that provides (hu)man's lifecycle with days and nights, the seasons, and the years"
I found this, your latest piece to be both significant and evocative, in the most direct fashion. If I can find the time, I will explain in greater detail, but for now, thanks.
Great job, Seraphim! Well written. I have discovered a few really talented writers through Jack. He has some very intriguing guest posters. Definitely resonating with aspects of what you wrote as I resonated with aspects of the other writers. But, of course, we're all individuals. So, there will be differences in opinion.
Astrology is the study of celestial objects which have been anthropomorphized. Imbued with 'human' qualities.
Not making an argument for or against, Seraphim, and believe me, I make no claim to be an expert in any subject. I am interested in it, as well as Astrotheology, and will study your piece further. Perhaps those celestial 'objects' imbue us? With energy? Purpose?
I don't believe we are on a spinning ball, orbiting a sun 93 million miles away, Seraphim. No worries if you are laughing uncontrollably right now. I am used to it.
By 'believe', I mean simply, to the best of my current reasoning abilities, I seem to exist on an extended, stationary plane. I've studied evidence for and against both Flat Earth and Heliocentric Globe models. Plus considered egg shaped, concave, a toroidal field . . . even the possibility matter itself is a kind of a reflection of our consciousness and may not 'exist' in 'space' at all. A virtual simulation. A hologram, as Jack has mentioned.
I doubt the stars are suns. They seem to be some kind of interesting lights. Look at the Zodiac, which was created through study of these 'lights' and how much knowledge has been embedded in that. They seem to be following some kind of divine arrangement, like a celestial timepiece, rather than random objects spinning uncontrollably in a chaotic, meaningless infinite vastness of 'space.'
By the way, I don't believe NASA sent anyone to the moon, either. I am sure you're aware of the occult origins of that agency. I am not for or against anything when I study it, do you understand, Seraphim? I don't think in those simplistic, binary, black/white, good/evil, terms. Or at least, I try to stay out of that mental territory as much as possible. I find it prevents me from learning. The truth is the truth, and that's what I am seeking. Not looking to have my pet theories confirmed, but rather to truly be a student of the reality behind the fiction. I am just a student, Seraphim, here to learn. So please don't think I am being sarcastic or absurdly humorous, but I doubt the moon is a place you could 'go to' to begin with, in the physical sense. NASA has reasons for existing that are totally occulted from Joe and Jane Sixpack, who think they are living on a rotating globular object surrounded by an infinity of similar globular objects.
I fully admit I could be wrong in any of my assertions, Seraphim. But I don't think it is wise to not trust my own God-given natural senses -- and believe the opposite of what they are telling me -- based on some dubious theorems other human beings created. Isn't that the same thing as religion or politics or philosophy? Evidence required for me to be believe the opposite of what my senses tells me, as well as my intuition, would have to be persuasive indeed. And I mean, rational, and verifiable.
Seraphim, I realize my ability to learn the truth behind what is occulted is dependent on my not having any preconceived notions regarding good/evil. Or preconceived notions of what is and is not 'possible.'
They are both simplistic representations of two forces. I am interested in the third force, which most never notice, which Gurdjieff and other Fourth Way authors have discussed. Reconciliation. This force would often be the thing most never consider, when analyzing a phenomenon.
I don't believe 100 % we are on a flat, stationary plane. That is the one that seems the most plausible, at this stage of the information I have available to study. But I realize what you write is true, our genetic spacesuits (physical bodies) are inhibiting our ability to understand actual reality. It provides blinders and buffers so valuable information (through these vibrations you mentioned) is not available to us, or if it is, it's in a diminished capacity. Our pitiful range of awareness of the electromagnetic spectrum would seem to be one example of this. Do we really 'see' with our eyes? Or are they inhibitive filters for the necessary illusion of isolation and 'alone'-ness we feel inside these 'spacesuits'?
Gnosticism rings true, Seraphim. In Gnosticism, this realm is called Hal. It is a bad copy of something real.
Midgard?
Some kind of middle realm. Created by an incompetent god at best, a psychopathic one at worst. Although, admittedly, one with a great, if bizarre, sense of humor. But this is not our true home.
Astrology is an ancient and venerated science derived through observation and study of the firmament, regardless of what it is. Astronomy, outside the realm of celestial observation, is a pseudoscience based on nothing but academic hot air. NASA is naught but the entertainment division of Jet Propulsion Laboratory and the disciples of Theodor von Karman, Jack Parsons and their master Aleister Crowley...
Yea been there done that myself...
I admit I struggle with Astrology and the Solar System, Planets etc but I do believe that the things that run this place, place their bets on it. I sumise that the Sun is local.. no way no how its 93 million miles away. IF it was at that distance it would be a constant size or dot in the sky. We have all seen a HUGE sunset in our lives when the Sun is rather quite large...Are our eyes even designed to see something 93 million miles away? Stars are basically in the same place every year so again cant wrap my head around we are hurtling through space, spinning at the same time observation tells me otherwise. Again FOR SURE I feel there is something to it.. just at this time in my life it evades me.
"Essentially, it is the spiralling, spinning journey of our Earth around the Sun that provides (hu)man's lifecycle with days and nights, the seasons, and the years"
Seraphim,
I found this, your latest piece to be both significant and evocative, in the most direct fashion. If I can find the time, I will explain in greater detail, but for now, thanks.
MK
Great job, Seraphim! Well written. I have discovered a few really talented writers through Jack. He has some very intriguing guest posters. Definitely resonating with aspects of what you wrote as I resonated with aspects of the other writers. But, of course, we're all individuals. So, there will be differences in opinion.
Astrology is the study of celestial objects which have been anthropomorphized. Imbued with 'human' qualities.
Not making an argument for or against, Seraphim, and believe me, I make no claim to be an expert in any subject. I am interested in it, as well as Astrotheology, and will study your piece further. Perhaps those celestial 'objects' imbue us? With energy? Purpose?
I don't believe we are on a spinning ball, orbiting a sun 93 million miles away, Seraphim. No worries if you are laughing uncontrollably right now. I am used to it.
By 'believe', I mean simply, to the best of my current reasoning abilities, I seem to exist on an extended, stationary plane. I've studied evidence for and against both Flat Earth and Heliocentric Globe models. Plus considered egg shaped, concave, a toroidal field . . . even the possibility matter itself is a kind of a reflection of our consciousness and may not 'exist' in 'space' at all. A virtual simulation. A hologram, as Jack has mentioned.
I doubt the stars are suns. They seem to be some kind of interesting lights. Look at the Zodiac, which was created through study of these 'lights' and how much knowledge has been embedded in that. They seem to be following some kind of divine arrangement, like a celestial timepiece, rather than random objects spinning uncontrollably in a chaotic, meaningless infinite vastness of 'space.'
By the way, I don't believe NASA sent anyone to the moon, either. I am sure you're aware of the occult origins of that agency. I am not for or against anything when I study it, do you understand, Seraphim? I don't think in those simplistic, binary, black/white, good/evil, terms. Or at least, I try to stay out of that mental territory as much as possible. I find it prevents me from learning. The truth is the truth, and that's what I am seeking. Not looking to have my pet theories confirmed, but rather to truly be a student of the reality behind the fiction. I am just a student, Seraphim, here to learn. So please don't think I am being sarcastic or absurdly humorous, but I doubt the moon is a place you could 'go to' to begin with, in the physical sense. NASA has reasons for existing that are totally occulted from Joe and Jane Sixpack, who think they are living on a rotating globular object surrounded by an infinity of similar globular objects.
I fully admit I could be wrong in any of my assertions, Seraphim. But I don't think it is wise to not trust my own God-given natural senses -- and believe the opposite of what they are telling me -- based on some dubious theorems other human beings created. Isn't that the same thing as religion or politics or philosophy? Evidence required for me to be believe the opposite of what my senses tells me, as well as my intuition, would have to be persuasive indeed. And I mean, rational, and verifiable.
Seraphim, I realize my ability to learn the truth behind what is occulted is dependent on my not having any preconceived notions regarding good/evil. Or preconceived notions of what is and is not 'possible.'
They are both simplistic representations of two forces. I am interested in the third force, which most never notice, which Gurdjieff and other Fourth Way authors have discussed. Reconciliation. This force would often be the thing most never consider, when analyzing a phenomenon.
I don't believe 100 % we are on a flat, stationary plane. That is the one that seems the most plausible, at this stage of the information I have available to study. But I realize what you write is true, our genetic spacesuits (physical bodies) are inhibiting our ability to understand actual reality. It provides blinders and buffers so valuable information (through these vibrations you mentioned) is not available to us, or if it is, it's in a diminished capacity. Our pitiful range of awareness of the electromagnetic spectrum would seem to be one example of this. Do we really 'see' with our eyes? Or are they inhibitive filters for the necessary illusion of isolation and 'alone'-ness we feel inside these 'spacesuits'?
Gnosticism rings true, Seraphim. In Gnosticism, this realm is called Hal. It is a bad copy of something real.
Midgard?
Some kind of middle realm. Created by an incompetent god at best, a psychopathic one at worst. Although, admittedly, one with a great, if bizarre, sense of humor. But this is not our true home.
Pleasure chatting with you.
Astrology is an ancient and venerated science derived through observation and study of the firmament, regardless of what it is. Astronomy, outside the realm of celestial observation, is a pseudoscience based on nothing but academic hot air. NASA is naught but the entertainment division of Jet Propulsion Laboratory and the disciples of Theodor von Karman, Jack Parsons and their master Aleister Crowley...